Further Reading: Celebrating the Brilliance of The King of Kong
Kim Newman reassesses the much-loved videogaming doc.
One documentary from the US last year spoke to avid videogamers more than any other, and in the process told a brilliantly human story about good, evil and Donkey Kong. In this week's Further Reading, Kim Newman celebrates The King of Kong.
This is the most exciting, audience-involving film of any kind I've seen this year. At none of the previews of the summer's blockbusters was I part of such a vocal, enthusiastic and wholly-gripped crowd as I was at a relatively small screening of a picture which has made its UK debut as a DVD retail item.
The King of Kong is an aptly ragged-looking documentary which takes a completely uninviting subject -- a controversy in the world of retro-computer gaming about whether longtime Donkey Kong champion Billy Mitchell should cede his title to contender Steve Weibe -- and makes it the stuff of legends. Donkey Kong, for those who don't remember, is (or, rather, was) an early, fiendishly difficult game from the Super Mario Bros stable, in which the plumber tries to ascend various ladders to rescue a princess, while avoiding missiles tossed by a malign ape. From the DVD extras, I learned that the game was originally supposed to feature Popeye, Olive Oyl and Bluto, but the Japanese designers couldn't get the rights to the characters and came up with their own.

Billy Mitchell, hailed as 'the gamer of the century', is a reptilian, faux-cool smarm-bucket who invokes fanatical loyalty from longtime rivals and associates, including Brian Kuh (the third-highest DK scorer), who scuttles around with Renfield-like devotion to his master, and Walter Day, the bizarre Roberts Blossom lookalike who has taken on the mantle of definitive judge for the field (an accolade confirmed when he strikes an alliance with the Guinness Book of Records).
Though a patriot, a family man, a successful hot sauce tycoon and rated as ultra-cool by his circle, the goateed and distinctively coiffed Mitchell comes across onscreen as a classic villain. Even his closest friends call him devious, but he is also tragically puffed up in his idea of celebrity, flirting with the interviewer and referring to himself in the third person as if he were a world leader planning a counter-coup rather than a probable saddo whose highest achievement (a perfect Pac-Man score) means less and less with every passing minute.

Wiebe, by contrast, is a classic underdog: following a run of near-miss careers in baseball and music, he took up the game after being laid off, then reinvented himself as a science teacher loved by his students. Crucially, in this showing at least, he doesn't even seem to think that much of his knack for DK, though he is clearly as obsessively devoted to chasing the record as Mitchell is to keeping it.
Director Seth Gordon intended a more general inside-retro-gaming documentary but lucked into an astonishingly potent storyline and must have sorted through acres of footage to get stuff this good. So good, in fact, a dramatised remake is reportedly in the works. It has vivid supporting characters, including Roy Schild (aka 'Mr Awesome'), a secondary 'evil mastermind' in Wiebe's camp and Wiebe's amazing children (a young son who shouts 'stop playing Donkey Kong' as Dad is on his first record-breaking attempt, a tweenage daughter who wryly observes that a lot of people ruin their lives trying to get into the Guinness Book of Records).
![]() on Aug 07 2008 08:49 AM This freakin documentary was amazing. Anyone who is interested in documentaries should check it out! (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 07 2008 09:00 AM This was a great watch. I'm almost embarrassed at how much I enjoyed it. (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 07 2008 09:15 AM I hope the former record holder gets sodomized by ogres. (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 07 2008 10:10 AM I really love this documentary. It's funny, inspring and touching. (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 07 2008 10:26 AM i loved it. btw: you know, that billy got the record back playing publicly (july '07), right? (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 07 2008 10:44 AM I was suprised how well sportsman- like and inspiring this documentary was. It's definately worth a look. Better than anything the fat guy Michael Moore does. (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 07 2008 12:23 PM I have no idea why I haven't watched this one yet. To the Netflix, robin! (Reply to this) |
![]() on Aug 07 2008 12:37 PM I got quite a kick out of this movie. (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 07 2008 12:39 PM I think it's on instant viewing for Netflix. (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 07 2008 12:50 PM Problem is, its not true. Many facts were change to make Mitchell look far worse than he really is. Like when he drives away from the resturaunt...he was actually parking on the other side of the building. Do a google search, you'd be surprised all the stuff the film changed for dramatic effect...who holds the record when you are watching any given scene (in one scene it shows Wiebe playing for the record but it doesn't tell you he was the current record holder at the time or that he held it for a year prior), Mitchell never playing Wiebe head to head (he does)...all BS. Fun film but up there with Micheal Moore when it comes to twisting facts. (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 07 2008 01:23 PM Mitchell is still an ***. No amount of editing can make someone nice look like such a bastard. . . . and I hope he gets sodomized by Slothful-Smurfs (All to last longer) Remember when Mitchell was at the restaurant, and being such a prick? (Reply to this) |
![]() on Aug 07 2008 02:20 PM That scene with Mitchell at the restaurant was one of the best scenes of the years. As well as when he showed up with his wife at the contest and just walked away. What a freakin prick. You can't write fiction this awesome! (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 07 2008 06:26 PM This movie is a great story, and I have yet to hit the cap on the number of times I can re-watch it and still enjoy it. :) I've envisioned my own personal casting selections for the remake h Rob (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 08 2008 05:12 AM TWO things. one, again the MPAA is retarded. this is rated pg13 because one of the people said "kick his 3ss". thats it, ONE word. wow, count the d3mn's and 2ss's in shrek. mpaa...you suck two...this is one of the best documentaries i've ever seen. and i HATE documentaries because they're usually boring and unentertaining. i've recommended this a bunch of times... (Reply to this) |
|
on Aug 13 2008 09:00 AM In reply to this comment (#1960392) Yeah... the problem with this movie is that it only get's interesting when it starts flat out lying. A) When Wiebe's record setting attempt is thrown do to concern over his machine, the reason is that the "Twin Galaxies" official rules don't allow for "Double-Donkey" machines, I.E. Donkey King/Donkey Kong Jr. combo machines (still a stupid rule, but the film distorts this). B) Also at this time, Wiebe was already the current Donkey Kong record holder, this attempt was about being the first to break a million, Wiebe was in fact trying to break his own record which he'd already won from Mitchell months earlier. C) Wiebe and Mitchell where friends, and played against each other in exhibition matches several times before and during the time period of the film. D) Mitchell actually greeted everyone in the Restaraunt and apologized for having to leave to handle a business issue. E) Mitchell's taped score was accepted on good faith that he was going provide better evidence, the score ended up being tossed 48 hours later. I'm not trying to defend anyone or take sides. Frankly I had never heard of Steve Wiebe, Billy Mitchell, Twin Galaxies, or any of this before I saw this movie, and really couldn't care less. Don't get me wrong, the story being a lie doesn't mean Twin Galaxie aren't a bunch of worthless dweebs who utterly failed at life and so created their little club and gathered around the super-loser who at least managed to acheive some success in the hot sauce industry and then set up the rules soe some outsider couldn't come along and make them less important. The problem is that that story is completely boring without all the fabricated, fictional drama and when you learn said drama is fiction, it goes back to be extremely boring. On the other hand, I suppose if you take for what it is (a not-really true story) then I guess it's commendable that the filmaker can take what is presumably incredibly boring footage that noone would care about and cut it into something interesting and fun to watch. (Reply to this) |

