ROTTEN TOMATOES: "Zoom" Tomatometer: Zero Comments

"Zoom" Tomatometer: Zero

by Tim Ryan | August 14, 2006

Summary

"Zoom" is soaring, flying high into the rarified territory where only seven films before it have ventured. The film, which stars Tim Allen and Courteney Cox, is joining an exclusive club -- films with more than 20 reviews that have garnered not a single "Fresh" rating from critics. In other words, we're talking nada, zilch, zero. Back to Article

(1-15 of 15 posts) | Reply

Now it's dark writes:
on Aug 14 2006 06:26 PM

[b]I thought it rocked![/b]
The critics really dropped the ball on this one.

(Reply to this)

cgcbooks writes:
on Aug 14 2006 06:38 PM

critics suck!

(Reply to this)

synergyred writes:
on Aug 14 2006 07:23 PM

Wow. While seeing Monster House, I jokilingly commented to my friend about how far Tim Allen's career has fallen. I guess it's fallen even farther than I realized.

(Reply to this)

mrdanny writes:
on Aug 14 2006 07:50 PM

some of the funniest reviews I have ever read!!!

(Reply to this)

killthemall4444 writes:
on Aug 14 2006 11:36 PM

Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever has that many reviews and not a single good one! That is pretty bad.

(Reply to this)

Pleasuretown writes:
on Aug 15 2006 12:40 AM

I feel really bad for Courteney Cox. Barnyard and Zoom? That's really horrible...

(Reply to this)

Senh Duong writes:
on Aug 15 2006 12:55 AM

In reply to this comment (#842141)
Yeah, at least Barnyard did modestly well at the box office. But Zoom. Ouch.

(Reply to this)

SpongeBob66x writes:
on Aug 15 2006 07:07 AM

wow,this film must really suck

(Reply to this)

aconline writes:
on Aug 15 2006 07:51 AM

In reply to this comment (#842140)
[b]Proud[/b]
I am proud to say that I found Ballistic enjoyable. The movie was directed by a guy calling himself Kaos. Zoom has a way to go to beat the 98 reviews held by title holder E vs S.

(Reply to this)

Prosper761 writes:
on Aug 15 2006 10:52 AM

Is anyone really surprised by this? "Zoom" is pale imitation of "Sky-High," Tim Allen is already a has-been, and not one of the kids in the film has the slightest bit of appeal. The only thing this movie has going for it is Courtney Cox (what happened to the 'Arquette,' by the way?) and one has to wonder why her agents thought this was a good project for her. A complete waste of everyone's time.

(Reply to this)

Now it's dark writes:
on Aug 15 2006 01:23 PM

[b]For those of you who did not like this film....[/b]
It is a fairytale and a bedtime story - if you can not see the beauty in this wonderful original story, I must say, I think your brain is too dense and I think you should stop watching movies.

You are all so hung up on the fact that it did not have a 'twist' but if you really listened deeply you would see that there was a VERY strong message in this film, something M. Night puts in all of his movies. Like I said, you are all too dense to understand it...

This movie was one of my favorites! It had so much emotion it made me go back and see it 2 more times just so I could feel what I felt the first time I saw it.

(Reply to this)

Master King Sexington writes:
on Aug 15 2006 01:46 PM

In reply to this comment (#842146)
Are you talking about Zoom or Lady in the Water? Cuz you sound like moron right now. I think you might have posted on the wrong forum

(Reply to this)

Mikeal420 writes:
on Aug 15 2006 05:52 PM

In reply to this comment (#842146)
You must be talking about Lady in the Water, but if you are talking about "Zoom" you should get an award for the best piece of written satire I've read all year!!

(Reply to this)

Bad_Animation_Man writes:
on Aug 15 2006 09:26 PM

[b]It's another Kid's movie that's been done a thousa[/b]
Just glancing at the review and it makes you feel sick to your stomach , Spy Kids , Sky High , X-Men , Fantastic 4 , it copies off all of these films and so much more . I don't even need to see the movie to know it would put a 4 year old to sleep .

0.0 out of 5 - Not Viewing .

(Reply to this)

unbreakable_samurai writes:
on Aug 16 2006 10:40 AM

Well it's tied Daltry now with 26 bad reviews.

(Reply to this)